Curse

zamial · Apr 28, 2008, 05:07 PM // 17:07

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tyla

(This thread should get locked)

QFT

Rezed from the dead and should be killed with vengance.

SirSausage · Apr 28, 2008, 07:28 PM // 19:28

/signed

But only for GW2.

eagleblade · May 08, 2008, 04:47 PM // 16:47

i'd like to see a option for the warrior to be able choose if he wants 2 swords instead of sword and shield.

example* sheild switched with a sword and new skills for it!

THREAD MERGED by Celestial Beaver. Please contribute to existing threads instead of starting new ones.

Jamster · May 08, 2008, 04:49 PM // 16:49

And the difference between that and an assassin would be..?

miskav · May 08, 2008, 04:50 PM // 16:50

So... you want an assasin, with more armour, more damage, and who can still equip a shield and function properly..

And you don't see the problem here because....?

MisterB · May 08, 2008, 04:52 PM // 16:52

Try a hammer.

eagleblade · May 08, 2008, 04:53 PM // 16:53

its a warrior with warrior skills not sin that is the difference

Quote:

Originally Posted by MisterB

Try a hammer.

that would work too

Merged by Celestial Beaver: Please use the button to edit your post rather than double posting.

miskav · May 08, 2008, 04:54 PM // 16:54

Yeah eagle, why not huh, strength added ontop + Evis with 2 weapons...

Yeah, I can totally see that work without hitting for 200+

Jamster · May 08, 2008, 04:54 PM // 16:54

Quote:

Originally Posted by eagleblade

its a warrior with warrior skills not sin that is the difference

then go a/w!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
OMG IM A GENEUS

eagleblade · May 08, 2008, 04:55 PM // 16:55

Quote:

Originally Posted by miskav

Yeah eagle, why not huh, strength added ontop + Evis with 2 weapons...

Yeah, I can totally see that work without hitting for 200+

i can see your flaming me when i'm just giving a idea

i'm refering to the equip screen

Merged by Celestial Beaver: Please use the button to edit your post rather than double posting.

Tyla · May 08, 2008, 04:57 PM // 16:57

Go play Diablo for dual wielding.

Dual weapons would be stupid imba in Guild Wars.

Jamster · May 08, 2008, 04:57 PM // 16:57

No, I'm the one flaming you

It would be completely overpowered, you notice assassins have their daggers' damage of 7-17, where as a warrior has 15-22. It's a sizeable difference. If 15-22 could hit twice, the same way as an assassin could with its 7-17, assassins would become even more redundant.

eagleblade · May 08, 2008, 04:59 PM // 16:59

no shield less protection and a sword well you know what that does.

so there is other weaknesses

its just a idea dont flame me for it pls

plus i think then the sins would have a worthy apponent

Merged by Celestial Beaver: Please use the button to edit your post rather than double posting.

Tyla · May 08, 2008, 05:03 PM // 17:03

Being attacked isn't a downfall in PvP as a Warrior.

MisterB · May 08, 2008, 05:04 PM // 17:04

It's a bad idea because of balance. Warriors already have a 2-handed, balanced weapon. It's called a hammer.

miskav · May 08, 2008, 05:11 PM // 17:11

eagle, stop double posting, it's annoying as heck.

Vale Todo · May 08, 2008, 05:39 PM // 17:39

I don't think its a bad idea at all, the Vikings did duel wield axes and swung continuesly non stop and the Samurai did have a fighting style in witch they wielded 2 swords. Maybe the duel wield option would give the Warrior a small attack speed increase at the expense of less armor and -30 HP from the shield.

natural_Causes · May 08, 2008, 05:40 PM // 17:40

Quote:

Originally Posted by miskav

eagle, stop double posting, it's annoying as heck.

/agree
That is just a bad idea. Warriors are the way they are for a reason. If you want duel weapons, get a Sin. All that would do is make the Warrior into a sin with more armor, which is totally unbalanced.

ShoGunTheOne · May 08, 2008, 05:48 PM // 17:48

and more to the point, daggers have a chance of Double Strike, dual swords will hit 2x 15-22 ALWAYS, so you see...that wouldn't work out....

so if they could dual wield, the only thing assasins have over warriors would have to be the energy regen

ShadowsRequiem · May 08, 2008, 05:58 PM // 17:58

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vale Todo

I don't think its a bad idea at all, the Vikings did duel wield axes and swung continuesly non stop and the Samurai did have a fighting style in witch they wielded 2 swords. Maybe the duel wield option would give the Warrior a small attack speed increase at the expense of less armor and -30 HP from the shield.

Samurai didnt use two swords. Only a Katana + a tanto.

/not signed.

This is a pretty stupid idea. Also you want to try the "search" as we've had hundreds of these ZOMG TWO WEAPONZ PLZ threads.